The user wants a detailed analysis and professional report based on the provided headline: “國際財經 – 白宮經濟顧問:若中國關稅稅率幾周內不變會感到驚訝”.
The report should be over 1000 characters, in traditional Chinese, follow specific formatting (Markdown, no leading headline, small titles, logical flow, engaging language), include factual information (from the search result if possible), and avoid greetings/closings.
Plan:
Generate search queries based on the headline to gather more context and details about the White House economic advisor’s comments and the potential implications of China tariffs.
Analyze the search results to understand the core message, the advisor’s identity (if possible), the context of the statement (e.g., trade tensions, specific products, timeline), and potential reactions/consequences.
Structure the report:
* Engaging opening setting the scene of global trade tensions.
* Introduce the specific statement by the White House economic advisor and its significance.
* Discuss the backdrop: current US-China trade relations, existing tariffs.
* Analyze the implications of the statement: What does “surprised if tariffs don’t change” mean? Is it a threat, a prediction, or a negotiation tactic?
* Explore potential scenarios: What kind of changes are expected? Higher tariffs? Broader scope? Retaliation?
* Discuss the potential impact on businesses, consumers, and the global economy.
* Concluding section summarizing the uncertainty and the importance of watching future developments.
Write the report in traditional Chinese, adhering to the specified tone and structure. Ensure it’s over 1000 characters.
Format in Markdown, use small titles, no main headline, and no greetings/closings.
Incorporate information from the search results naturally into the text, citing if necessary (though the instruction says *not* to attach sources at the end, the internal guideline says to cite sentences referring to search results – I will follow the internal guideline for citation format within the text if I use specific facts from the search result). *Self-correction: The user specifically asked NOT to attach sources or reference materials at the end and strictly follow their content requirements. The internal guideline about citations might be for general cases, but the user’s explicit instruction takes precedence here. I will integrate the information without explicit citation markers in the final output.*
Review for length, language, tone, structure, and adherence to all instructions.
